Build This Now
Build This Now
Get started

The pipeline

From idea to productResearch your marketSet up your environmentGenerate your specsBuild your features

What you get

DatabaseAuthenticationPaymentsEmailStorageCron jobsCaptchaCreditsDesign systemFrontend architectureBackend architectureAnalyticsReal-time

The AI system

OrchestrationThe agentsAgent teamsLearningPatterns

Design & brand

Generate your logoDesign your landing pageSet up your email domain

Grow your product

Add a new featureImprove a featureSettings page

Content & growth

BlogEmail sequencesSEOAI search optimization

Keep it solid

Security auditPenetration testingPerformance checkCodebase healthDrift detectionError monitoringFix production errorsAutomated monitoringSelf-healingRate limiting

Customize

CustomizeDesignBuildSecurityPerformanceBrainstorm

Reference

AdvancedStructureComponentsAll commandsTech stack

Agent teams

How agents group into specialized teams for complex work.

Solo agents handle most things

A typical feature runs through solo agents in sequence. Planner, database, backend, connector, designer, tester, quality gate. That covers most of what you'll build.

But some tasks benefit from multiple perspectives working in parallel. That's where teams come in.

The planning team

When a feature is large enough to warrant it, three specialists analyze the work simultaneously. One focuses on frontend concerns: what data the page needs, how it flows from server to client, what caching strategy makes sense. Another focuses on backend: database changes, API procedures, background jobs. A third focuses on user experience: what the user sees at each step, how it feels on mobile, what happens when something goes wrong.

A lead agent consolidates their analyses into a single plan. Conflicts get resolved. Redundant work gets merged. The result is a plan that's been stress-tested from three angles before any code gets written.

The design team

This one is unusual. When you want to explore different visual directions, the system can spawn multiple designers working on isolated copies of the codebase. Each one takes a different creative approach to the same spec.

You end up with multiple working implementations you can actually run and compare in the browser. Not mockups. Not screenshots. Running code on different ports. You pick the one you like, and the system merges it into your main codebase.

The testing team

Testing splits into two concerns that run in parallel. One agent tests the API layer directly, calling procedures and verifying they return the right data with the right permissions. Another agent opens a real browser and walks through user flows, clicking buttons and filling forms the way an actual person would.

For features that touch authentication, a third tester focuses specifically on auth flows: session handling, token refresh, permission boundaries, what happens when tokens expire mid-action.

When teams activate

You don't choose this. The orchestrator sizes each task and decides whether it needs solo agents or a team. Small and medium features get solo agents. Larger features get planning teams. Design competitions are triggered by a specific command. Testing teams activate whenever the spec includes user flows to verify.

The agents

What each specialist does and when the orchestrator calls on them.

Learning

The system gets better the more you use it. Here's how.

On this page

Solo agents handle most thingsThe planning teamThe design teamThe testing teamWhen teams activate