Build This Now
Build This Now
Get started

The pipeline

From idea to productResearch your marketSet up your environmentGenerate your specsBuild your features

What you get

DatabaseAuthenticationPaymentsEmailStorageCron jobsCaptchaCreditsDesign systemFrontend architectureBackend architectureAnalyticsReal-time

The AI system

OrchestrationThe agentsAgent teamsLearningPatterns

Design & brand

Generate your logoDesign your landing pageSet up your email domain

Grow your product

Add a new featureImprove a featureSettings page

Content & growth

BlogEmail sequencesSEOAI search optimization

Keep it solid

Security auditPenetration testingPerformance checkCodebase healthDrift detectionError monitoringFix production errorsAutomated monitoringSelf-healingRate limiting

Customize

CustomizeDesignBuildSecurityPerformanceBrainstorm

Reference

AdvancedStructureComponentsAll commandsTech stack

Orchestration

How specialist agents coordinate to build features without stepping on each other.

One session, many specialists

You paste a prompt or run a command. Behind the scenes, the orchestrator reads it, figures out what kind of work it is, and routes it to the right agents in the right order.

This is not one AI doing everything. It's a system where each agent owns a specific layer. One handles database schema and security policies. Another writes the API. Another wires server and client together. Another builds the UI. Another tests it. They work sequentially when the order matters and in parallel when it doesn't.

How a feature gets built

The orchestrator classifies your input first. A small bug fix gets handled differently than a new feature. A one-file change might not need a planner at all. A complex feature gets a full planning phase with multiple agents analyzing the problem from different angles.

For a typical feature, the sequence looks like this: a planner reads the spec and creates an execution plan with specific tasks for each agent. The database agent goes first because the schema shapes everything downstream. Then the backend agent builds procedures. Then a connector agent wires server and client data flow. Then a designer builds the UI. Then testers verify it works. A quality check runs at the end.

If something breaks during the build, the system has dedicated agents for that too. Type errors, build failures, lint issues. They get resolved before you see the output.

Why this works better than one agent

A single agent building a full feature makes trade-offs you don't see. It cuts corners on security to get the UI working. It skips edge cases to stay under the context limit. It writes code that compiles but doesn't hold up when users actually interact with it.

Specialists don't have that problem. The database agent only thinks about schema design, indexes, and row-level security. The designer only thinks about how things look and feel on every screen size. The tester only thinks about whether the flows actually work. Each one does its job well because it's the only job it has.

What you experience

From your side, it looks simple. Run a command. Wait. Review. Move on. The coordination happens behind the scenes, and the output is a feature that passes type checks, builds cleanly, and works on mobile.

Real-time

Live updates over WebSockets. Your app stays in sync without refreshing.

The agents

What each specialist does and when the orchestrator calls on them.

On this page

One session, many specialistsHow a feature gets builtWhy this works better than one agentWhat you experience