Build This Now
Build This Now
Raccourcis clavierGuide de la Status Line
Extension Claude Code pour VS CodeClaude Code vs Cursor en 2026Claude Code vs Cursor vs Copilot 2026OpenClaw vs Claude CodeOpenCode vs Claude CodeGemini CLI vs Claude CodeSEO IA et optimisation GEOClaude Code vs GitHub Copilot in 2026Les 7 meilleures alternatives à Claude Code en 2026Claude Code vs Aider en 2026Claude Code vs Cline en 2026Claude Code vs Devin en 2026Les meilleurs outils de code IA pour les fondateurs solos en 2026Claude Code vs Kiro in 2026: Spec-Driven IDE vs Terminal AgentClaude Code vs Amp: Which Coding Agent Should You Use in 2026?Claude Code vs Augment Code (2026): Which Agent Fits Your Codebase?Claude Code vs Zed (2026): Dedicated CLI Agent vs Fast AI EditorClaude Code vs Roo Code in 2026Claude Code vs Warp: AI Terminal or Dedicated Coding Agent?The Best Stack for an AI SaaS in 2026 (Next.js, Supabase, Stripe, RLS)Bolt vs Lovable vs v0: Which AI App Builder to Ship With?Claude Code Boilerplate vs the Code Kit: Harness, Not TemplateClaude Code Starter Kit: The Fastest Way to a Production SaaS (2026)Claude Code vs Antigravity (Google Gemini CLI Replacement)Claude Code vs Codex (2026): Which Is Actually Better?Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex in 2026: Which to Build a SaaS WithClaude Code vs JetBrains JunieClaude Code vs ShipFast vs Makerkit: The Claude-Native AlternativeClaude Code vs v0: Which Builds Production Next.js Apps Faster?Cursor vs Windsurf vs Claude Code: The 2026 AI Coding Tool Decision GuideGrok Build vs Claude Code (2026): Is xAI's $299 Agent Worth It?Headroom: Cut AI Agent Token Costs by Compressing ContextKeybindings Claude CodeLovable vs Claude Code for Non-Technical FoundersSpaceX Bought Cursor for $60B: What It Means If You Build on CursorConfiguration de la status line Claude CodeClaude Code vs Windsurf in 2026Claude Code vs Lovable: Terminal Agent vs App BuilderClaude Code vs Bolt.new: Which Should You Use?
CLAUDE.md, Skills, Subagents, Hooks: When to Use WhichClaude Code Subagents: The 3 to 5 Agent Sweet SpotCLAUDE.md Best Practices: The File That Makes Claude Code ReliableHow to Fix Claude Code Running Out of Context
speedy_devvkoen_salo
Blog/Toolkit/Extensions/Claude Code vs Antigravity (Google Gemini CLI Replacement)

Claude Code vs Antigravity (Google Gemini CLI Replacement)

Claude Code vs Antigravity: Claude wins on hard bug fixes and compliance, Antigravity wins on speed and cheap 1M context.

Arrête de tout configurer. Place à la construction.

Des templates SaaS avec orchestration IA.

Published Jun 27, 20267 min readToolkit hubExtensions index

Claude Code vs Antigravity comes down to one question: do you want raw speed or dependable trust? Antigravity (Google's Gemini CLI replacement) generates tokens about 4x faster and bundles 1M context into a $20/mo plan, but Claude Code scores higher on hard real-world bug fixes (64.3% vs 55.1% on SWE-Bench Pro) and is the only one of the two with enterprise compliance certifications like SOC 2 and HIPAA. For production SaaS work, Claude Code is the safer long-term bet.


Arrête de tout configurer. Place à la construction.

Des templates SaaS avec orchestration IA.


Why this matters to you

If you used Gemini CLI (Google's free command-line coding agent), you are now a refugee. On June 18, 2026, Google shut off free, Pro, and Ultra access and pushed everyone to Antigravity instead. You need to know whether to trust the new tool or move to Claude Code. This post answers that with numbers, not vibes.

The bait-and-switch most comparisons skip

Here is the part other reviews leave out. Gemini CLI was open source under the Apache 2.0 license (a license that lets anyone read, copy, and modify the code for free). Google accepted more than 6,000 community pull requests (code changes submitted by outside developers) and pointed to those contributions as proof the project was a success.

Then Google killed it. Announced at Google I/O on May 19, 2026, the free tiers went dark 30 days later on June 18. Gemini CLI was replaced by Antigravity CLI, a closed-source Go binary you run with the agy command. Closed-source means you can no longer read or fork the code. The shutdown stranded the 13,700+ forks (copies developers made on GitHub) and the people who built them.

So the real question is not just which tool benchmarks higher. It is which vendor you can depend on for the next year. Claude Code has not pulled a move like this. That is the trust gap.

The benchmark story depends on the task

Benchmarks are tests that score how well an AI handles a fixed set of problems. The two tools win different tests, so look at the test that matches your work.

Antigravity wins on:

  • Raw speed. Reported 289 tokens per second vs 67 for Claude Code. A token is roughly a chunk of a word, so this is how fast it types out answers.
  • General reasoning. ARC-AGI-2 (an abstract puzzle test): 77.1% vs about 40%.
  • UI visual tasks. ScreenSpot-Pro (finding the right spot on a screen): 72.7% vs about 38%.

Claude Code wins on:

  • SWE-Bench Verified (fixing real GitHub issues): 77.2% vs 76.2%.
  • SWE-Bench Pro (harder, real-world bugs): 64.3% vs 55.1%.

The takeaway: speed matters less than correctness when a bad fix costs you a paying customer. For shipping a SaaS product, the 9-point gap on hard bugs is the number that counts.

Claude Code vs Antigravity CLI: head to head

MetricClaude CodeAntigravity CLIWinner
Token speed~67 tok/s~289 tok/sAntigravity
Context window (paid entry)200K at $20/mo1M at $20/moAntigravity
SWE-Bench Verified77.2%76.2%Claude Code
SWE-Bench Pro (hard bugs)64.3%55.1%Claude Code
ARC-AGI-2 (reasoning)~40%77.1%Antigravity
Built-in browser agentNoYesAntigravity
Compliance (SOC 2 / HIPAA)YesNoClaude Code
Open sourceNoNoTie
Cloud procurement (Bedrock/Vertex/Foundry)YesNoClaude Code
Free tierNoYesAntigravity
Entry paid price$20/mo$20/moTie

Source figures are reported vendor and community benchmarks as of June 2026. Verify against current vendor docs before you buy.

The compliance gap is a hard blocker for some teams

Compliance certifications are formal audits that prove a tool handles data safely. Claude Code ships SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA-readiness, SSO (single sign-on login), SCIM (automated user account management), audit logs, and a Compliance API with downloadable proof documents.

Antigravity has none of these as named-product certifications. Google's cloud infrastructure is certified, but those certs do not automatically cover the Antigravity product itself. If you work in fintech, healthcare, or enterprise B2B, this alone can decide it. No SOC 2, no deal.

The context window pricing trap

Context window is how much text the AI can hold in memory at once. Both tools support 1M tokens, but the price to reach it differs.

  • Antigravity: 1M context on every paid tier, starting at $20/mo.
  • Claude Code: 1M context requires Max ($100/mo), Team ($25/user/mo), or Enterprise. On the $20/mo Pro plan, Claude Code caps at 200K tokens.

Be honest with yourself here. If huge context is your main need and compliance is not, Antigravity wins on price. That is a real Antigravity advantage, not a footnote.

If you trust neither Google nor Anthropic

Some developers want no lock-in to either vendor. After the shutdown, the community shipped three forks within weeks: OpenGravity, EchoCopi, and Centravity. These are community attempts to keep an open Gemini-CLI-style tool alive. They are early-stage, so treat them as experiments, not production tools yet.

Enterprise deployment flexibility

Claude Code runs through Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry. That means a company can buy it through cloud contracts it already has, which is often the deciding factor in regulated industries. Antigravity has no equivalent path. For procurement teams, that flexibility is the tiebreaker.

Where Build This Now fits

Whichever CLI you pick, the harder part is wiring it to ship real apps instead of code snippets. The Build This Now Code Kit ($29 one-time) is a build system for Claude Code: a production SaaS skeleton with auth, Stripe payments, and PostgreSQL with row-level security on every table, plus Claude Code subagents, a tuned CLAUDE.md, and workflows already set up. It runs on Claude Code, so a separate Claude subscription is required, and you can deploy anywhere. If you are migrating off Gemini CLI and want a fast on-ramp, it removes the blank-page problem.

FAQ

Is Antigravity CLI better than Claude Code?

It depends on the task. Antigravity generates tokens about 4x faster and scores higher on general reasoning and UI tasks. Claude Code scores higher on complex code bug resolution (SWE-Bench Pro: 64.3% vs 55.1%) and is the only option with enterprise compliance certifications such as SOC 2 and HIPAA. For production SaaS work, Claude Code is the safer pick.

What happened to Gemini CLI?

Google shut down Gemini CLI for free, Pro, and Ultra users on June 18, 2026, which was 30 days after announcing the change at Google I/O on May 19. It was replaced by Antigravity CLI, a closed-source Go binary you run with the agy command. Enterprise users on Gemini Code Assist Standard or Enterprise plans were not affected.

Is Antigravity CLI open source?

No. Antigravity CLI is a closed-source proprietary binary. Gemini CLI, which it replaces, was Apache 2.0 licensed with 13,700+ GitHub forks at the time of shutdown. Antigravity publishes only a changelog, a readme, and a demo GIF.

Claude Code vs Antigravity: which has the bigger context window?

Both support 1M tokens, but access differs by plan. Antigravity includes 1M context on all paid tiers starting at $20/mo. Claude Code's 1M context requires the Max plan ($100/mo), Team ($25/user/mo), or Enterprise. On the $20/mo Pro plan, Claude Code is limited to 200K tokens.

Continue in Extensions

  • SEO IA et optimisation GEO
    Un tour d'horizon de la Generative Engine Optimization : comment faire citer ton contenu dans les réponses de ChatGPT, Claude et Perplexity plutôt que simplement classé sur Google.
  • Les meilleurs outils de code IA pour les fondateurs solos en 2026
    Les meilleurs outils de code IA pour les fondateurs solos en 2026, classés selon ce qui livre vraiment un produit : Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Aider et un kit SaaS pré-construit. Des choix honnêtes pour les fondateurs techniques et non techniques.
  • Les 7 meilleures alternatives à Claude Code en 2026
    Les meilleures alternatives à Claude Code en 2026 : Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, Aider, GitHub Copilot, Devin et Gemini CLI. Une comparaison honnête du prix, de l'autonomie et de la personne à qui chacune convient.
  • The Best Stack for an AI SaaS in 2026 (Next.js, Supabase, Stripe, RLS)
    The best stack for an AI SaaS in 2026: Next.js 16, Supabase, Stripe, Vercel, with pgvector and RLS. Free until you have revenue.
  • Bolt vs Lovable vs v0: Which AI App Builder to Ship With?
    Bolt vs Lovable vs v0 compared: v0 wins on UI, Lovable on fastest full-stack MVP, Bolt on code control and mobile. Plus the honest production caveat.
  • Claude Code Boilerplate vs the Code Kit: Harness, Not Template
    A Claude Code boilerplate is starter code you babysit. A harness tells Claude how to build. Here is the difference and why it changes output quality.

More from Toolkit

  • CLAUDE.md, Skills, Subagents, Hooks: When to Use Which
    Claude Code skills vs subagents vs hooks vs CLAUDE.md: a plain mental model for picking the right primitive, with token costs and examples.
  • Claude Code Subagents: The 3 to 5 Agent Sweet Spot
    Claude code subagents work best at 3-5 concurrent agents. Here is why that ceiling exists, how to set them up, and what to use past it.
  • CLAUDE.md Best Practices: The File That Makes Claude Code Reliable
    CLAUDE.md best practices: keep it under 200 lines, write it by hand, and use hooks when you need real enforcement, not advice.
  • How to Fix Claude Code Running Out of Context
    Claude Code running out of context is a session design problem. Fix it with /compact, lean CLAUDE.md, skills, and subagents, not a bigger window.

Arrête de tout configurer. Place à la construction.

Des templates SaaS avec orchestration IA.

Claude Code Starter Kit: The Fastest Way to a Production SaaS (2026)

A Claude Code starter kit needs two layers: a harness that tells Claude how to work and a production SaaS codebase. Here is what to look for in 2026.

Claude Code vs Codex (2026): Which Is Actually Better?

Codex isn't better than Claude Code in 2026, it's cheaper to run. Here's the real difference in tokens, rate limits, pricing, and output quality, with cited 2026 benchmarks.

On this page

Why this matters to you
The bait-and-switch most comparisons skip
The benchmark story depends on the task
Claude Code vs Antigravity CLI: head to head
The compliance gap is a hard blocker for some teams
The context window pricing trap
If you trust neither Google nor Anthropic
Enterprise deployment flexibility
Where Build This Now fits
FAQ
Is Antigravity CLI better than Claude Code?
What happened to Gemini CLI?
Is Antigravity CLI open source?
Claude Code vs Antigravity: which has the bigger context window?

Arrête de tout configurer. Place à la construction.

Des templates SaaS avec orchestration IA.