Build This Now
Build This Now
Claude Code ModelsDeepSeek V4: Pricing, Context, and MigrationClaude Code Quality Regression: What Actually HappenedClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5Claude Opus 4.7 vs Other AI ModelsClaude Mythos: The Model That Thinks in LoopsClaude Opus 4.5 in Claude CodeClaude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 vs 4.6Claude Opus 4.7 Use CasesClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5Claude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4.1Claude 4Claude 3.7 SonnetClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and Claude 3.5 HaikuClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude 3Every Claude Model
speedy_devvkoen_salo
Blog/Model Picker/Claude 4

Claude 4

Claude 4 launched May 2025 with Sonnet 4 and Opus 4, pushing Claude Code mainstream. 200K context, 16K output, agentic reliability, extended thinking baked in.

Stop configuring. Start building.

SaaS builder templates with AI orchestration.

Published Mar 19, 2026Model Picker hub

Claude 4 was the release that pushed Claude Code into the mainstream. Before May 22, 2025, the tool was a side project for early adopters poking at what AI coding could actually do. After Anthropic shipped Sonnet 4 and Opus 4 that day, it turned into the thing working engineers used to ship code.

Key Specs

SpecSonnet 4Opus 4
API IDclaude-sonnet-4-20250514claude-opus-4-20250514
Release DateMay 22, 2025May 22, 2025
Context200K tokens200K tokens
Max Output16,384 tokens16,384 tokens
StatusActive (still available)Superseded by Opus 4.1

The jump in coding ability was a generational one. Old Claude Code had promise but was mostly an experiment. With the 4 family, it became a tool that developers reached for day in, day out.

Professional software engineering. Real codebases stopped being a problem. Multi-file refactors, debugging that ran through dependency chains, and substantive code review all became things you could trust the model with, not just toy snippets.

Agentic reliability. Both models stuck to long, multi-step instructions without wandering. Workflows that fire tool calls in sequence to reach a goal stopped falling apart halfway through and started being production-safe.

Better instruction following. Earlier releases used to skip parts of a prompt or slip in changes no one asked for. The 4 family held the line on constraints and specs much tighter.

Extended thinking arrived with Claude 3.7 Sonnet and was a real step forward. Claude 4 took that groundwork and delivered on it everywhere:

  • Code quality stayed more consistent over long sessions
  • Fewer made-up imports or calls to APIs that did not exist
  • Sharper grasp of a project's layout and house conventions
  • Gains on benchmarks pulled from actual engineering work, like SWE-bench

The jump read less like a version bump. It read like watching a junior dev step up to mid-level. You could hand it a goal and it would understand the thing you wanted, not just echo the literal words you typed.

Sonnet 4 was the daily driver. Fast enough to keep up with an interactive session. Strong enough for most of the work you threw at it. Cheap enough to run all day. Most people on Claude Code left it set as the default.

Opus 4 handled the heavy lifting. Save it for tricky architecture calls. Deep debugging runs. Any task that needed every ounce of reasoning you could throw at it. Slower and pricier, but noticeably stronger when the problem required holding a lot of moving pieces in mind at once.

Sonnet 4 is still on the API under its model ID. Opus 4 is no longer the top of the line. Opus 4.1 took that slot and tightened its production reliability.

Most users today should start on the 4.5 generation. Claude 4 still earns its spot on the timeline. The 4 family proved that coding with AI could hold up as a real engineering workflow rather than a toy.

Related Pages

  • All Claude Models for the full version timeline
  • Opus 4.1 for the step that replaced Opus 4
  • Model selection guide for deciding what to run today

More in Model Picker

  • Claude Mythos: The Model That Thinks in Loops
    Claude Mythos is suspected to use recurrent-depth architecture: one shared layer looped N times, with ACT halting so hard questions get more passes and easy ones stop early.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 vs Other AI Models
    Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4, Kimi K2.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V3.2: benchmarks, context windows, agent reliability, and cost, so you reach for the right one.
  • DeepSeek V4: Pricing, Context, and Migration
    DeepSeek V4 ships two models: V4-Flash at $0.28/M output and V4-Pro at $3.48/M. Both carry a genuine 1M context window and drop into any Anthropic-compatible SDK with one line changed.
  • Every Claude Model
    Every Claude model on one page: Claude 3, 3.5, 3.7, 4, Opus 4.1 to 4.6, Sonnet 4.5 and 4.6, Haiku 4.5. Specs, pricing, benchmarks, and when to use each.
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and Claude 3.5 Haiku
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 and 3.5 Haiku launched October 2024 with Computer Use beta, cursor control, upgraded coding and tool use, and cheaper Haiku at $0.80/$4.
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet launched June 2024 at $3/$15, beating Claude 3 Opus on MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval at a fifth of the cost. Specs, benchmarks, and code gains.

Stop configuring. Start building.

SaaS builder templates with AI orchestration.

On this page

Key Specs
Related Pages

Stop configuring. Start building.

SaaS builder templates with AI orchestration.